ABSTRACT
El riesgo es un concepto que suele ser evaluado por los científicos y expertos en salud pública mediante la comparación de probabilidades. Sin embargo, esta perspectiva inscrita en el utilitarismo ético, que considera que la mejor decisión es aquella que tiene menos probabilidad de daño que de beneficio, no contempla aspectos normativos fundamentados en otras perspectivas éticas. La interpretación del origen de las polémicas públicas derivadas de las reacciones de las personas ante los pequeños riesgos de las vacunas con virus atenuados contra el SARS-CoV-2 y la evaluación de las respuestas de las instituciones públicas requiere conocer tanto los aspectos cognitivos que introducen sesgos sistemáticos en la valoración de probabilidades como el marco sociológico, ético y político que contextualiza la gestión de los riesgos en las sociedades modernas. (AU)
Risk is a concept that is usually evaluated by scientists and public health experts by comparing probabilities. However, this ethical utilitarian perspective, which considers that the best decision is the one that has less probability of harm than of benefit, does not consider normative aspects based on other ethical perspectives. Interpreting the origin of public controversies arising from people's reactions to the small risks of attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and evaluating the responses of public institutions requires an understanding of both the cognitive aspects that introduce systematic biases in the assessment of probabilities and the sociological, ethical, and political framework that contextualizes risk management in modern societies. (AU)
Subject(s)
Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Mass Vaccination , Risk Management , Risk Assessment , Policy Making , Ethical AnalysisABSTRACT
Risk is a concept that is usually evaluated by scientists and public health experts by comparing probabilities. However, this ethical utilitarian perspective, which considers that the best decision is the one that has less probability of harm than of benefit, does not consider normative aspects based on other ethical perspectives. Interpreting the origin of public controversies arising from people's reactions to the small risks of attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and evaluating the responses of public institutions requires an understanding of both the cognitive aspects that introduce systematic biases in the assessment of probabilities and the sociological, ethical, and political framework that contextualizes risk management in modern societies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cognition , Humans , Public HealthABSTRACT
Una parte importante de la morbimortalidad se debe a hábitos de vida y factores de riesgo modificables. Una estrategia prometedora para promover el cambio de tales factores pasa por la aplicación de intervenciones de salud pública basadas en la economía del comportamiento, rama del conocimiento que combina principios psicológicos y económicos. Este artículo se centra en un tipo de intervención conocida como nudge (traducida habitualmente como «empujón» o «acicate»), que modifica la conducta sin restringir la capacidad de elección de las personas. Se analizan las diferentes propiedades que caracterizan a los nudges y diversos ámbitos en los que se han aplicado con éxito: vacunación, alimentación, actividad física, cesación tabáquica y prescripción de medicamentos. En conclusión, la economía del comportamiento y los nudges tienen un gran potencial para su aplicación en la esfera de la salud pública en España
A large part of morbimortality is caused by lifestyle habits and modifiable risk factors. A promising strategy to promote the change of such factors is the implementation of public health interventions based on behavioral economics, a discipline that combines psychological and economic principles. In the present article, we focus on a type of intervention known as "nudge" (that has been translated into Spanish as empujón or acicate), that changes behaviour without limiting the individual's choice. We analyze the properties that characterize nudges, and several areas in which they have been successfully implemented: vaccination, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation and drug prescription. We conclude that behavioural economics and nudges have great potential for their implementation in the public health sphere in Spain
Subject(s)
Humans , Economics, Behavioral/trends , Health Behavior/classification , Healthy Lifestyle/classification , Indicators of Morbidity and Mortality , Risk Factors , Behavior Therapy/methods , Evaluation of Results of Therapeutic Interventions , Health Promotion/methods , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Feeding Behavior/classification , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: En este trabajo se cuestiona si el desarrollo del Sistema de Autonomía y Atención a la Dependencia (SAAD) contribuyó a incrementar el volumen de recursos del sistema público de servicios sociales (efecto desplazamiento) o, por el contrario, si dicho desarrollo se produjo a costa del resto de prestaciones de servicios sociales (efecto sustitución). MÉTODO: Se realiza una aproximación de datos de panel, orientada a explicar el comportamiento del gasto per cápita en servicios sociales para las comunidades autónomas españolas de régimen común en el periodo 2002-2016. RESULTADOS: La introducción del SAAD se asocia con un incremento del 14% en el gasto por habitante en servicios sociales. Este efecto se acerca al 25% cuando la variable explicada es el gasto en transferencias corrientes de carácter social. También se constata que los cambios legislativos introducidos en 2012 y 2013 se asociaron a una reducción del gasto per cápita en transferencias corrientes del 10%. CONCLUSIONES: Esta evidencia refutaría la hipótesis de que el SAAD ha originado meramente un efecto de «sustitución» en el gasto autonómico en servicios sociales
OBJECTIVE: In this paper we address whether the System for Personal Autonomy and Care of Dependent Persons contributes to increasing the volume of resources of the public social services system (displacement effect) or, on the contrary, whether this development has taken place at the expense of other social services (substitution effect). METHOD: Panel data analysis is used to explain how per capita expenditure on social services evolves in the Spanish Regions under the common regime in the period 2002-2016. RESULTS: The implementation of the Dependency Act is associated with a 14% increase in the level of per capita expenditure on social services. This effect raises 25% when the variable explained is expenditure on current transfers of a social nature. On the other hand, law changes introduced in 2012 and 2013 were associated with a reduction in per capita expenditure on current transfers of around 10%. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence would refute the hypothesis that the System for Personal Autonomy and Care of Dependent Persons had merely a "substitution" effect on autonomous spending on social services
Subject(s)
Humans , Social Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Frailty/epidemiology , Social Work/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Work/economics , Health Expenditures/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Socioeconomic Factors , Social Determinants of Health/trendsABSTRACT
A large part of morbimortality is caused by lifestyle habits and modifiable risk factors. A promising strategy to promote the change of such factors is the implementation of public health interventions based on behavioral economics, a discipline that combines psychological and economic principles. In the present article, we focus on a type of intervention known as "nudge" (that has been translated into Spanish as empujón or acicate), that changes behaviour without limiting the individual's choice. We analyze the properties that characterize nudges, and several areas in which they have been successfully implemented: vaccination, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation and drug prescription. We conclude that behavioural economics and nudges have great potential for their implementation in the public health sphere in Spain.
Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Economics, Behavioral , Health Behavior , Life Style , Risk Reduction Behavior , Habits , Humans , Public Health , Risk Factors , SpainABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this paper we address whether the System for Personal Autonomy and Care of Dependent Persons contributes to increasing the volume of resources of the public social services system (displacement effect) or, on the contrary, whether this development has taken place at the expense of other social services (substitution effect). METHOD: Panel data analysis is used to explain how per capita expenditure on social services evolves in the Spanish Regions under the common regime in the period 2002-2016. RESULTS: The implementation of the Dependency Act is associated with a 14% increase in the level of per capita expenditure on social services. This effect raises 25% when the variable explained is expenditure on current transfers of a social nature. On the other hand, law changes introduced in 2012 and 2013 were associated with a reduction in per capita expenditure on current transfers of around 10%. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence would refute the hypothesis that the System for Personal Autonomy and Care of Dependent Persons had merely a "substitution" effect on autonomous spending on social services.
Subject(s)
Budgets/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Expenditures/legislation & jurisprudence , Long-Term Care/economics , Social Welfare/economics , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Models, Econometric , Social Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Socioeconomic Factors , SpainABSTRACT
Because of its incidence and mortality colorectal cancer represents a serious public health issue in industrial countries. In order to reduce its social impact a number of screening strategies have been implemented, which allow an early diagnosis and treatment. These basically include faecal tests and studies that directly explore the colon and rectum. No strategy, whether alone or combined, has proven definitively more effective than the rest, but any such strategy is better than no screening at all. Selecting the most efficient strategy for inclusion in a population-wide program is an uncertain choice. Here we review the evidence available on the various economic evaluations, and conclude that no single method has been clearly identified as most cost-effective; further research in this setting is needed once common economic evaluation standards are established in order to alleviate the methodological heterogeneity prevailing in study results.
